Thanks for the response Raf.
 
Yes the Nagios cgi pages are correct - I assume that is because its
reading that info from files.
 
My opsviewd.log does have a few import issues that seem to co-incide
with when we see problems - I am concerned about the one at the top of
this list
 
[2009/07/08 17:44:54] [import_ndologsd] [WARN] Import of
1247068819470548, size=35240212, took 2674.88318109512 seconds > 5
seconds
[2009/07/08 17:45:02] [import_ndologsd] [WARN] Import of
1247068821483999, size=86727, took 8.11954402923584 seconds > 5 seconds
[2009/07/08 17:45:34] [import_ndologsd] [WARN] Import of
1247068834758987, size=2306127, took 28.0002701282501 seconds > 5
seconds
[2009/07/08 17:45:51] [import_ndologsd] [WARN] Import of
1247068844539990, size=1401907, took 16.6511950492859 seconds > 5
seconds
[2009/07/08 17:46:07] [import_ndologsd] [WARN] Import of
1247068852496928, size=1386952, took 16.3429758548737 seconds > 5
seconds
[2009/07/08 17:46:32] [import_ndologsd] [WARN] Import of
1247068863620525, size=2233089, took 25.1329939365387 seconds > 5
seconds
[2009/07/08 17:46:45] [import_ndologsd] [WARN] Import of
1247068871060241, size=1083300, took 13.0434839725494 seconds > 5
seconds
[2009/07/08 17:47:10] [import_ndologsd] [WARN] Import of
1247068949423567, size=537320, took 6.85540199279785 seconds > 5 seconds
[2009/07/08 17:52:54] [import_ndologsd] [WARN] Import of
1247070234375124, size=100348, took 5.26332020759583 seconds > 5 seconds
 
We are using a remote server for the mySQL database which is of a very
high spec, hardware is Sun, it has 16GB of RAM etc, so I dont think the
database server is the issue - so although we dont have the innodb
optimisations on it (it hosts a few databases) I dont think this is the
problem. 
 
I am currently thinking that it may be a network issue between the
Master and the Database server - is this likely?
 
Also are we just over-doing it with the set up - we have?
 
We have 12 slaves, which are not pooled.
 
Slave 1       
103  Hosts 
398  Checks 
  
Slave 2   
367  Hosts 
779  Checks 
   
Slave 3
58  Hosts 
180  Checks 
 
Slave 4 
223  Hosts 
404  Checks 
 
Slave 5 
143  Hosts 
242  Checks 
 
Slave 6
429  Hosts 
856  Checks 

Slave 7
327  Hosts 
827  Checks 
 
Slave 8
341  Hosts 
818  Checks 
 
Slave 9
142  Hosts 
190  Checks 
  Enabled 
 
Slave 10
185  Hosts 
948  Checks 

Slave 11
195  Hosts 
950  Checks 

Slave 12
227  Hosts 
329  Checks 
 
For a total of 2764 hosts and 7080 checks.
 
In the short term is there anyway of changing the importndo interval to
10 seconds rather than 5 to see if that eases anything.


________________________________

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rafael
Luis Carneiro
Sent: 09 July 2009 14:12
To: Opsview Users
Subject: Re: [opsview-users] Hostgroup Caching ?


David,
Are you seeing the correct state in the nagios (cgi) pages?
If that's the case your ndoimport is behind, and you can easily see in
the opsviewd.log file (you will see something like "[import_ndologsd]
[WARN] Import of <number>, size=<number>, took XXX seconds > 5 seconds".

http://docs.opsview.org/doku.php?id=opsview3:faq#import_took_5_seconds

Raf



On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 6:30 AM, David Bell <[email protected]>
wrote:


        
        Hi there.
         
        I have an issue with the Hostgroup Hierarchy under the View
section.
         
        If I have some checks that have gone to Unknown, it can take up
to 30 minutes for them to clear to OK after they recover.
         
        At this time you can click into the Hostgroup, and the hosts
will still show as Unknown, but if you then go into the host you see the
true status.
         
        You probably recognise the name, yep I am the guy stuck with
12.2 on SLES10 Enterprise, so I know support is limited, but if you can
give me some insight into the mechanism for generating what I assume are
these cached views, it would be appreciated, I am working on persuading
the people that need to be persuaded to let me rebuild this on Debian
(and getting somewhere at last) but the users are starting to question
the choice of Opsview because of what they perceive as bugs as they
cannot understand where problems actually come from.
         
        Thanks
         
        David
         
          
         
David W Bell 

Systems Developer 

UK Infrastructure   

Maxima  PLC

 MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from
"wlmailhtml:{a0c5521f-79f0-4676-a608-69984109f564}mid:" claiming to be
www.maxima.co.uk 

 

Tel:    +44 (0) 20 7579 8100 

DDI:   +44 (0) 20 7579 8129 

Fax:   +44 (0) 20 7579 8200

 24 Chiswell Street

London

EC1Y 4TY

        P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 

         

        _______________________________________________
        Opsview-users mailing list
        [email protected]
        http://lists.opsview.org/lists/listinfo/opsview-users
        
        




-- 
Rafael Carneiro
Computer Engineer

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________
Opsview-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opsview.org/lists/listinfo/opsview-users

Reply via email to