On 10/13/10 5:25 PM, Sebastian Hahn wrote: Ooops, sorry for the delay. I spent the past 1.5 weeks in JSP Hell TM! Catching up with email today...
> On Oct 13, 2010, at 8:51 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote: >> - What shall we do with the Torperf run on ferrinii that fetches a 50 >> KiB file every minute and notes the path? I think Sebastian wanted this >> run to validate whether our assumption about Tor doing path selection is >> correct. Do you still want to do this? Shall I keep it running? > > I thought we would want to run all our torperfs this way, because it would > collect just the data and when we need it we can look at it. Is there an > indication that this would be unwise? Right, we can change the 3x3 Torperfs we're running to write their paths to disk. But in the question above I was referring to the (fourth) Torperf run on torperf.tpo that requests a 50 KiB file every minute. You asked me to set that one up a few weeks ago. Shall I keep it running? And if so, what are we doing with the data? >> - Shall we "upgrade" the Torperfs on moria/torperf.tpo/siv to write >> their path to disk? Sebastian, did you finish the script to combine >> .data and .extradata files? And can you push your .extradata code to the >> main repository? While upgrading the Torperf scripts, should we also >> upgrade the Tor clients? Last time I checked, siv was running >> 0.2.1.24-dev, torperf was running 0.2.2.10-alpha-dev, and moria was >> running 0.2.2.8-alpha-dev. > > I did finish the script, it is in my bug1918 branch currently. I had hoped > for some review before pushing my code to the main review, but if > that's unlikely to happen I'll merge. I'm going to do the upgrade today and will let you know if something breaks. Thanks, --Karsten
