Correct. It will look like the disk was unlocked, but the real data remains hidden.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan D. Proulx Sent: 19 May 2006 20:03 To: or-talk@freehaven.net Subject: Re: Did you see this? On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 07:22:00PM +0100, Tony wrote: :I didn't say a false key, I said a dummy key. One that will work, but :would unlock a dummy outer volume - but not all data within it. There is :no way of telling the inner contents of such a drive from random data. :There are several products that can do that. The act specifically says :that if there are multiple keys then you can choose which one to :release. : :Destroying a false key and claiming you didn't have the key would be :illegal if you still possessed the real key. That was my point, and I mis understood what you meant by dummy key apaprently. Are you talking about an encryted and steganographic filesystem such that after a request is made (and granted) for the key to the encrypted file|filesystem the nested encrypted file|filesystem will go undetected and thus a key will never be requested for it? How very Oniony... -Jon
