Yes, Ringo, I also wonder why it suddenly changed. I never saw any discussion either.
In my opinion Vidalia has too many bugs to be released in a package that is supposed to be stable. If the developers want to include an unstable program like Vidalia 0.0.4, they should clearly call the tor-vidalia-bundle beta, or something more honest than stable. I immediately went back to using TorCP, as it is stable and predictable. Vidalia messed up me server settings, and my comments I had made in the torrc file. Vidalia has the potential to become a good program, but the decicion to include an unstable release of Vidalia together with a stable release of TOR wasn't very smart, in my opinion. I would appreciate it if the developers continued to include TorCP in the bundle, until there is a stable Vidalia release where known bugs have been fixed. Also, it would be good to know why a GUI to TOR is called Vidalia? Where is the connection between the names? Why was Vidalia chosen as name? My opinion is that the name of a GUI should be related to the name of the main program. But maybe Vidalia is just a temporary GUI, and therefore the good names are saved for future GUI releases? Sorry for complaining, I'm doing it so the developers of TOR and Vidalia can make better programs. ;-) Thanks for creating TOR! /Viking --- Ringo Kamens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was just wondering when we switched from the old > torcp to vidalia. I > didn't really see any discussion about it. > Ringo Kamens > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
