Will it incorporate as an sfx archive? Regards, Arrakistor
Friday, August 4, 2006, 9:27:45 PM, you wrote: > You might try UPX to see how it compares to 7zip compression. I find it's > almost always better. > From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UPX > "... as UPX is specifically designed to compress executable code > it often achieves better compression ratio than standard data > compression facilities such as gzip, zip or bzip2. " > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Arrakistor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Anothony Georgeo <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2006 12:06:35 PM > Subject: Re[2]: Torpark 1.5.0.6 Pre-release > I used 7zip, which compressed the 24MB down to about 7MB > Right now I am using Adblock with the Filterset.G updater. > Regards, > Arrakistor > Thursday, August 3, 2006, 8:26:02 PM, you wrote: >> Hi Arrakistor, >> --- Arrakistor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Howdy, >>> >>> I am ready with the release of Torpark 1.5.0.6 (7MB) >>> >>> - Decompressed size of 24MB for USB friendly >>> footprint (reduced from 40MB) >> Did you use UPX v.2.0.1? This version offers better >> .exe compression and better Win32 compatability. >> <http://upx.sourceforge.net/> >> I use the "--best" switch as "--brute" takes a *long* >> time to process and I haven't seen better compression >> ratios vs. "--best". >>> - Adblock using Filterset.G Updater >> Do you use Adblock or Adblock Plus? IMO ABP is >> supirior to AB. >> Anogeorgeo >> __________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> http://mail.yahoo.com
