Thus spake Taka Khumbartha ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On 8/26/06, Mike Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <snip> > >I also find it unpossible that actual watermarking was used against > >this fellow as opposed to simple IP tracking. > > > i would not doubt that; that article about tracking anonymous voip > calls is nearly a year old.
Academic research leads reality by at least 5-10 years.. For shit that requires infrastructure changes (like this), sometimes 20. Also dude had way too large amounts of false positives/negatives for wide-spread use, if you ask me. Maybe possible for targeted use, but I would bet they'd only haul this out if IP failed. They also would have to be global/working with Skype unless they had his destination ahead of time. And to use it against Tor, where you have no idea what the nature of incoming traffic is to watermark.. unthinkable. Paper actually says this if you'd read it. Remember kids, tinfoil hats cause cancer. Research at MIT proved it. -- Mike Perry Mad Computer Scientist fscked.org evil labs
