-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 Just a note, Squid is very bad for privacy with tor. Please see the related documentation on the wiki!
Thanks, Andrew - --- Frivolous lawsuits. Unlawful government seizures. What's YOUR defense? Protect your assets, keep what you earn, and generate more income at the same time! Visit http://www.mpassetprotection.com/ On 11/18/2006 08:04 AM, gabrix wrote: > I have installed squid on the gateway machine together with > privoxy-tor .Squid is configured to have privoxy-tor as parent > proxy. Iptables is set to redirect port 80 traffic to squid's port > 3128 .I have tor-privoxy on each lan machine and browsers' > torbutton , too.when i start a browser connections from a lan > machine browsers are configured with the local privoxy-tor and with > tcpdump on the gateway machine , http traffic doesn't seem to go > to port 80 where iptables is supposed to redirect packets to squid > 3128. If i click on a port 80 url , because tor , traffic goes to > tor network , let's say 9001 but it differs from time to time.How > can i catch with iptables tor traffic coming from my lan?By port > we sayd too generic, i tryied by --uid-owner debian-tor but it > doesn' seem to work,neither! Thank you !!! My lan machines are > debian sarge stable kernel 2.6 , my gateway machine is a debian > etch 2.6,too. > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFX262gwZR2XMkZmQRAyeWAKCcadhM6jRNXBSRI6Bl49I9JGWo2QCdGxuA 3A4TBQ9e661FuX/XgY1QmVs= =WSet -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
