Seth David Schoen writes: > Anthony DiPierro writes: > > > Or what about a hidden service for reading web pages in general? > > Something which doesn't support POST (or maybe even GET), so is much > > less likely to be used abusively. Is this feasible? > > The current directory scheme does allow (in fact, requires) policies > to be specified in terms of IP addresses and TCP port numbers. So > a "web browsing only" exit node is possible.
Though not really, because the set of servers listening on TCP port 80 is neither a subset nor a superset of the set of web servers. -- Seth Schoen Staff Technologist [EMAIL PROTECTED] Electronic Frontier Foundation http://www.eff.org/ 454 Shotwell Street, San Francisco, CA 94110 1 415 436 9333 x107
