-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 It's been working OK until now... Perhaps the sig was malformed? Also, what keyserver are you checking with? My key isn't supposed to expire until 8/28/08, and no one else uses this box. Sometimes I wish PGP could have more specific error messages than just "bad"... :\.
Thanks, Andrew - --- Frivolous lawsuits. Unlawful government seizures. What's YOUR defense? Protect your assets, keep what you earn, and generate more income at the same time! Visit http://www.mpassetprotection.com/ today. On 03/21/2007 03:22 AM, Dan Collins wrote: > OpenPGP Security Info > > Error - signature verification failed > > gpg command line and output: > C:\\Program Files\\GNU\\GnuPG\\gpg.exe --charset utf8 --batch --no-tty > --status-fd 2 -d > gpg: Signature made 03/20/07 23:23:32 using DSA key ID 73246664 > gpg: BAD signature from "Andrew Del Vecchio ([EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG > Key (2048 bit)) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" > > Andrew Del Vecchio wrote: >> Thanks for the insights so far. I have done some documentation work on >> the wiki, but I've run out of things to write. What are the areas most >> in need of documentation that is also NOT programming side, which I >> don't know much about? I also support the project financially already. >> Perhaps I can get some of our members to do so as well. >> >> We would be using Tor as a cover for a cluster of e-mail servers which >> send constituent messages to Congress. Currently, we do this directly, >> but we've had a few isolated "accidents" in the past that were not >> explained, and seemed a bit like political censorship, though we can't >> prove it due to the usual "plausible deniability" that politicians so >> treasure. >> >> I agree that this whole thing may have negative consequences, but >> would it be possible to configure Tor so that we had a separate node >> network that was not connected to Tor, at least not as far as end >> nodes go? This would shift and contain the blame to our participants >> and not the entire community. Still, governments are famous for their >> tendency toward collective punishment, so perhaps that wouldn't do >> much anyway. >> >> Is there any other solution? >> >> ~Andrew >> >> ---- >> >> Frivolous lawsuits. Unlawful government seizures. What's YOUR defense? >> Protect your assets, keep what you earn, and generate more income at the >> same time! >> Visit http://www.mpassetprotection.com/ today. >> >> >> >> >> On 03/20/2007 07:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:28:51PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> wrote 1.5K bytes in 40 lines about: : Anyway, we are testing the >>> possibility of using Tor to help prevent : being blacklisted by >>> Congressional IT bureaucrats. In conjunction with >>> What would be blacklisted? Your current IPs and domains or Tor >>> Servers? Circumventing blocks with Tor will only result in Tor >>> being blocked. Angering Congress IT people doesn't seem smart. >>> Perhaps the people with which you interact aren't scientists, but >>> I'll assure you these people exist. Starting an arms race with >>> them is a losing proposition. Chances are they can outspend you on >>> solutions. >>> : this, we'd like to encourage participants (at least donor : >>> participants) to help out by running their own Tor exit nodes to : >>> improve the anonymity and bandwidth capability of the network we've >>> : all come to know and love. I'm all for doing this, but the >>> question : is, how do we do this in a proper manner? My fear is >>> that spreading : the word too much will get us in trouble >>> eventually. Worst case >>> "Yay Tor more nodes!" Helping create more Tor nodes is great. >>> Doing so with a long-term commitment is better. Your choices >>> really come down to funding your own projects or funding Tor to >>> build these things (LiveCD, USB Stick, point-click-tor-exit node, >>> tor exit node in a box if you will). There exist a few projects >>> similar to these. Many of these are orphans. >>> Alternatively, helping Tor better document and make it easier to >>> create exit nodes is just as big of a help. Having easy to follow >>> instructions and GUIs (such as Vidalia) go a long way towards more >>> nodes. >>> As for spreading the word, the horse is out of the barn and halfway >>> across the country. Tor is not a secret. If you're looking to >>> anger the IT dept for Congress, don't use Tor as the leverage. >>> It's bad for Tor, and bad for you in the long run. >>> These are my initial thoughts. I may have more later on. >>> Thanks! > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGAW8CgwZR2XMkZmQRA2g1AJ9RGMfZ8M4ddnOpt9uAbvLqWtXn8ACfcFLI m+OFJlE2d3xrFD8hcFFgzFI= =e7gG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
