-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Well, that's the problem with power, those in power enjoy rubbing it in the face of those they have power over. Remember, I believe it was Lord Acton who said "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely". While I doubt it's a serious threat, still the potential exists, and given the current political climate it would not surprise me if they ran a server under a name like that just to scare people into not using Tor.
Karsten Loesing wrote: | > Yeah, that's the problem, given it says NSA, who knows for sure. As | > arrogant as govt. has gotten in the last few years it would not | > surprise me one bit to see them run a server under that name. | | But wouldn't they have even more fun, if they called their server | "WeLovePrivacy"? At least, I would have, if I were them... ;) | | Don't worry, the probability that it's an NSA server is the same as for | every other server in the Tor network. | | Karsten . -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGDmrwlzq1/FLekkARCrUxAKCPxNSyB/9+ZE9NGo/yC7HWAesPoQCgh02E SwZGwUtaEFtxG2DqZSJoTHQ= =+u4y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
