Sorry for my pertubation. It just seems everything is more difficult than it should be. And I guess I am po'd at myself also for discovering too late that dns requests were leaking. I guess I should be happy that my tcp requests appear to have been encrypted. Good thing I am not a terrorist, haha.
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:41:31 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 05:30:30PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote > 13K bytes in 288 lines about: > : This group has not changed. I give information in good faith and then > : nobody replies. > > Actually, you seemed to be doing just fine without needing help. If > there were explicit questions you wanted answered, I missed them in the > descriptions of what you encountered. > > : out now). This is why more people don't use Tor, it seems to be only > the > : domain of an elite group, who could care less if others join in. > > Hardly. Tor can be difficult to correctly configure for fantastic > anonymity. Many applications, operating systems, and networks conspire > against you to reveal your tcp traffic destinations. Many people have > problems comprehending the real threats to anonymity versus movie-plot > threats as seen on the Internet. We're working to make it easier to > correctly configure and use. No matter how easy we make it, the next > hop will always be in an arms race to defeat Tor's gains. > > Sorry you felt un-loved on or-talk. You seem to be doing fine reverse > engineering your local library's network. > > -- > Andrew -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail
