On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 11:20:01AM CEST, Paul Syverson wrote: > I disagree with that. There still has been no spam over Tor in the > scenario you described. Rather someone has logged into a system over > Tor and used _that_ system to send spam. I'm not saying Tor would not > have been used in any way by the person in this scenario. I am saying > that no spam was sent over Tor in what you described. You could also > claim by your logic to have shown that the statement that there is no > spam over HTTPS is history.
Following your argument: even if someone would use Tor to send Spam via SMTP you could say it was not "Spam over Tor", since he used a mail relay to send the Spam. Still, using SMTP it would be generally considered "Spam over Tor". -- Lexi -- Eorb.-Ofqycg. Bvuo Rogvfoeon, Clig 2I08, Tvb: +49 241 80 21419 CATW Llhwvf, Ofqycgltod OS, Lwycfntc. 55 - 52056 Llhwvf - Kvcglfx | Ecig nvoe fic pcls ife mvokt vihw gintvcwlqt, | Blnnt Rwlftlnov, got lbbvf owcvf Hwyvcvf, | Svcfifqt, Svcntlfe, Vgrqofeifk, Bvoevfnhwlqt, | Eyhw, gvcdt vihw aywb! fohwt ywfv Flccwvot wyvcvf.
