> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] > Gesendet: 10.11.07 06:38:52 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: 20090101
> > Am Freitag, 9. November 2007 schrieb Eugen Leitl: > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 07:42:46PM +0100, Valen MacLeod wrote: > > > Heisst das jetzt, dass ich das protokollieren muss, wenn ich > > > einen TORserver betreiben will? > > > > Not yet. A lot of things can and will change until 1. January 2009, > > and I would definitely look for an official legal interpretation > > before you pick between your three choices of what to do (or not to > > do). > > > > What are the most friendly jurisdications for anonymizing services? > > I was thinking about Russia, but it's probably not cheap to rent > > a server there. Any russian Tor operators here? > > The Germans on this list can participate in a Verfassungsbeschwerde > (constitutional complaint?) here: > > http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/content/view/51/70/ > > Martin > -- > Dr. Martin Senftleben, Ph.D. (S.V.U.) > http://www.drmartinus.de/ > http://www.daskirchenjahr.de/ > > > -- Several weeks ago i registered a Tor exit node (123Tor). I thought it's a good thing for privacy. After reading the mailing lists I was really extremely shocked about the arrested Tor-Server admins and other things. The result was I'm shutting down my exit-node immediately. After that I'm assume that Tor is needed in the free world, so i set up a new node (arachne) on a debian linux box as middleman. Living in Germany can be very hard. First the Hackerparagraph and now the Vorratsdatenspeicherung. Because of this I've just signed in the list. Greetings Rüdiger
