-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 F. Fox wrote: > However, let's suppose that we're in a time when German Tor nodes are > now actively keeping logs of all connections. What would be the best way to:
As I already said in an earlier posting, German Tor nodes won't be starting logging before 1/1/2009 - if they'll log at all - there's still a pending lawsuit against the data retention law in the supreme court. And I bet that there will be a lot civil disobedience when it comes to logging. > [... idea ...] > So, what if a maximum of one German Tor node were allowed in a circuit? > Would that achieve both numbered goals? If that's the idea, than it should only be the middleman node. Entry-node might be possible too, but only if you make sure that this node is the only German node in the circuit. > Given the logging, it might be wise to not allow the German node to be > the exit node; I'm not sure about the entry guard. Considering the pressure which piled up in the last couple of months in Germany, running an exit-node in Germany is not encouraged anyway. > I would think that a German middleman node would be safe, though, right? If it's the only German node in the circuit: Possibly. Alex. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) iQCVAwUBR1Mn5BYlVVSQ3uFxAQK/fQQAqe496ityWEiTZovIazse0XpBusyV0G+8 Zn5mVkZpREl9J0PZ4uKFRB6ydwBZ1TJNFsMIbgHZhhGsJqstGBQBfR8U5gAI2FtS kAEv62vTm8EPBOAUWx7UZKwuekmo2veQD0c5b/t77jaXUph067Qbdnh/7PnqQ7vn ESTZOMavZis= =i84f -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
