I'd be interested in participating. Comrade Ringo Kamens On Dec 20, 2007 11:34 PM, Andrew Del Vecchio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Speaking of the devil, I've actually thought about this an came up with > an entire system about a year or so ago, but I couldn't find anyone who > seemed to find interest in it, so it's been in hibernation since then. > Send me an e-mail and I'll dig it up my whitepaper for you (right now > I'm in the middle of something else and I'll be traveling tomorrow). > > ~Andrew > > - -- > People just like you lose untold millions in personal wealth due to > frivolous lawsuits and unfair government seizures. > Are you protected? Read the Asset Protection Crash Course at > http://www.keepyourassets.net?andrew to find out how to protect your > hard-earned assets. > > > coderman wrote: > > On Dec 19, 2007 2:53 PM, Martin Fick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Anyone interested in designing a Snail Mail Onion > >> Routing protocol to be used to build a strong real > >> world (non-computer) anonymous package receiving > >> network? :) > > > > what you want is a zero knowledge mix, not a "snail mail onion routing > > protocol". :) > > > > see http://www.freehaven.net/anonbib/ for lots of zero knowledge > > mixing ("mix") info... > > > > this is off topic for Tor, as such mixes are not low latency. > > however, they are the appropriate for the design you seek and most of > > the open questions you pose are answered in various papers on the > > subject. > > > > best regards, > > > > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFHa0JQgwZR2XMkZmQRAlHLAKCQhFE76o438PXDLKFwtHwe2b9WWgCgqo8B > D2FdHx+IbW4NRZVrg5QxS1g= > =UdNJ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
