-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Roger Dingledine wrote: (snip) > (It's unclear what anonymity impact this might have, but it might be > substantial: if a lot of our potential paths through the network involve > a slow link, and we discard all those potential paths, that would make > a big difference. On the other hand, that's exactly the point.) (snip)
Sounds like we have ourselves a conundrum, and a tradeoff. =:oD - -- F. Fox AAS, CompTIA A+/Network+/Security+ Owner of Tor node "kitsune" http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBR6PT/ej8TXmm2ggwAQiQwxAApBiCb4ulVs8v/ZJ/4xwQF0l2vLOdDDIr zDfVGVj/bGdXJExf572STcQyOQ2jCGQYANvlt0nfeCto/7M2mVKEclHS5HvodUga TUSmiZ1cRZTIwWBBqBTA2PXSIp0PWutka5TpMcdSQeLek0IRfI+KvSCfdDj+I4HW OtrN+hNP8RHHRBiNi73/mL3opvRnG9Qr5RlNE9YBlqTAMb5SIWoKPVsu0cio52Rw 8J8ddnc9ciYvbTmJa5mnvlg4FiTB8QpK3SHJi6OyglMasJt00x3PFQb9lNcnrSzU gBdCS/lYgmkxzFL/XWxNKrPqdoRO4zrhlDswBJJo4Gs7UgSbZbfTSFgzu+KYMHjX AhU+pjpYu4uitikmsWA0Lq+0j7ZXgzc+Q0wq4RKDs+XZmO4fI5gBGmYpZyEljwJV v/oGd+HXXWM7P3Ej0VV4Nwk+P50Vah9SYDBqDFogbId/N1ZcBAEzvuKWzDe/D46+ vkM1/bKQIz2Rq2WPus+GRruJ/tbf0PEqA9aE7MAJhDQRmx1PYEEfvHnbHj/qPAFV EoOEaHVW5hR03k7qdCfXssJ8/txP5ktYy7RytMLX71GxdmmIRUeTPrG/zGczOlzX L8QR9/8pQXpLrak3GNFZP6tjKzHDidGu/UPuKd5s4N9uBY4LQhgdTE2eIlU/C/lk T1m6EQdXTsc= =C+MP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
