Hi! Thank you for your reply. I mentioned this in my last post to this thread which I just send, with the group 1 & 2 and charlie brown mention, please refer to it, thank you.
These may not be strange user agents, but a collection of user agents varying in popularity which may be modified by the user to include their own additional user agents. Sure, being within a group of the most popular UA is desirable, but it is not truly blending as other concerns stick out like a sore thumb. Perhaps in addition to rotation of UA, the other solution of spoofing enabled plugins when they are disabled would be useful in evading the fingerprinting of browser. I do not believe a static UA choice is useful over the long term. > this is the part I need more input: "and I don't believe simply mixing in > with the crowd is enough, as the user is likely to have many other blatent > Tor-like signs, especially with most everything turned off like > javascript, java, etc." > as I suppose that mixing with the crowd is better than spiking out with > strange user agents.
