My guess is mplsfox02 is running a sniffer on his exit node that accepts PCRE regexs as filters. Ethereal?
--- On Thu, 8/7/08, M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Abuse statistics > To: [email protected] > Date: Thursday, August 7, 2008, 9:00 PM > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > scar: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] @ 2008/08/05 07:24: > >>> So the profilers feed the > >>> spammers? :-) > >> > >> what's with the happy face? you get a kick out > of this, playing > >> detective? > > > > Wow, icy wind here. For me this situation has > something tragicomical. > > Sorry for disturbing you serious life. > > > >> most of us already assume this is happening. we > don't need your > >> statistics. > > > > I think it's always a good thing to move towards > less assumptions and > > more knowledge. And please be more humble and > don't speak as "we". There > > were at least several people appreciating the stats. > > > >> as is said in the FAQ, criminals already have > better ways of doing > >> things without Tor. > > > > So? I'm not looking at criminals but general usage > patterns, "abuse" and > > side-effects. I'm doing this for my own, but I > think it's fair to share it. > > > > Statistics were pretty interesting. > > Could you share the script(?) which collects statistics? > I'm not > currently running exit-node, couple of middlemans only. > I'm just curious > about the approach to collecting data. Where do you get the > connection > info? Are you running Linux? Bash, perl, php or something > else? > > m > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - > http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iEYEARECAAYFAkibOCoACgkQeaKwdrf2V0rG8QCgjPXsTFA4JYVQcWe5T4sxqcwW > pWAAnjKIZJxaG/iveSDCMhF9FzLMi5bR > =sDLR > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
