On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:08:09PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.9K bytes in 30 lines about: : 1. 8 tor processes, each using separate spool directory : 2. 8 privoxy processes, each configured to talk to separate tor.
Why 8? Why not 1? 2? 16? : 3. First squid, with malware domains blacklist, will have 8 round robin cache peers configured. (squid-in) Using blacklists seems like a recipe for disaster. Much like the various lists floating around of suspect tor nodes, I suspect these blacklists are based on very little research and more on "I heard my 3rd cousin once received a virus from some site that looked like this". I could be wrong. : 4. Havp, with squid-in as parent. (Anti-virus proxy, using clamav :) ) : 5. Second squid, that will use havp as parent (squid-out). Users will connect to this one. Why the double proxy? And does this open up a new threat for shared users on the system to see when/how someone downloaded something through this setup based on how long it takes to retrieve an object? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
