On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 09:21:09AM +0100, Lexi Pimenidis wrote: > Just for their (and your) information: the maximum possible penality > for non-compliance is 500,000 EUR plus the fees of the law suit.
If you're running a middle-man only node on domestic broadband the logging part is your provider's problem, no?</ianal> (I asked a German provider (Hetzner) who told me they're not going to log for colo customers, so there things will be more risky). > I really appreciate Tor and I also appreciate people to stand up for > Tor. But keeping Tor running without logging after January 1st and not > being filthy rich *and* having having a tons of lawyers in your kitchen > will IMHO be similar to suicide. > > There got to be another alternative - and I don't refer to logging. Bullet-proof hosting or incorporating behind an offshore front would come to mind -- both are not bargain options. There are of course several other, illegal possibilities. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
