OgnenD, > I think peer review exists in science (and technology) for a purpose. If > there > is only one analyst, maybe your claim holds. However, results in general need > to be testable and reproducible by anyone, so that everyone can convince > themselves in the validity of claims being made. Anyways, this is just my > philosophical remark, it is not the main interest of why I asked the original > question.
In academics, peer review is great, and needed. However, it follows that in science that the scientific method be followed. The results must be empirical and quantifiable. If such a method is known, and an analyst can propose some method of testing that we all relatively agree upon, and the results are measurable, I think that would be great and I welcome that. > This is, however, much more interesting to me. You seem to imply that a > company in one jurisdiction owns/operates nodes in another jurisdiction. Am I > understanding this correctly? That is correct. Steve
