-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Drake Wilson wrote: > Quoth Scott Bennett <[email protected]>, on 2009-02-13 07:27:10 -0600: >>> TCP connection has much more of this than would be present if one were >>> using the underlying packet network more directly, I think.) >> But I don't think reimplementing all of that over UDP is necessarily >> the optimal way to go about it. > > I'm not sure who proposed reimplementing Tor with UDP... ? > (snip)
It's listed in this document, though I don't know who the original proposer(s) were: https://svn.torproject.org/svn/tor/trunk/doc/roadmaps/2008-12-19-roadmap-full.pdf - -- F. Fox Owner of Tor node "kitsune" http://fenrisfox.livejournal.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJJlY08AAoJECxKjnsrYHNHijUQAL5ezXVNU384G4Gp1xhv5udv LTPZa1Rg3CwPUatfJViLRquBZkiw3IIvAUJW9tt6GI41QpB8OjS9kPPzczJDFZQB z4E44Fu9/7HCAsPnLaSJMM9U7eorkAWmLnyiYfiC7t3qLeDahz+0hpBHTt1+1Qga 9i9sxiTbk2qqevQO3/CGHBMrRJOjzMvO99oMyDsp2CGW3+ISwIpV88MD41TwhWyW iu9vxdJNqol//izV3Fs3RGgboIEe7lJwDKxND/C0kRqabwJ9eHSRYnKOdWtm/o7y sOlN+MWeSLviWaelreS/rlH8n23BIXuSvFchoX3YE+ijwLDwMhHo+mX5JhcSeXoQ IR63YeXE+pSHENdoSoOE8nX36fe6nW/4UvwZ6qxNvXO/Gafwx+H4Pt/kcNpj6DTR d0Ep1goCRFUpSj7JsKyQ/B5JYslicbXI6L5PN5t53n3Oqjgr4mrYR/koQFABOtXQ h46zbjdvNymg3+hmNjN9AKodJHRI+ZQxT+NXXS0uuI0v5MpHHy0zQ6aFOtF/U0Jk rS/4VLi1zRvJ87nHs4D1AkMeEeN9zvqC52YhaxU4I4UEJCevMcjrQRDjP5qBTkg9 G3XtLXOrhoUR63dEbBmkgTjCSzh4VhLtRr5ymS+YYHKTPT6Yxb1ui3dEemWamt/6 abvGHhTKNl6/VqHAlwyq =QVfM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
