On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 01:02:09PM +0200, Karsten N. wrote: > If we have problems to introduce our bridges, we should search for a > general solution and do not give all bridges exclusive to a political > campaign.
There are only a few hundred running bridges right now. I think it's fine to "use" them all this week, if people want to. We'll have more later, and it'll be good to learn some lessons here. > Seems I am not up to date. My last information was, a GMail account is > used for publish bridges. It does not working? Is there a solution in > development? May I help in any way? You can discover some bridge addresses either with a gmail account, or with a web browser: https://bridges.torproject.org/ https://www.torproject.org/bridges#FindingMore It seems that other people are collecting bridge addresses manually and giving them out when they find people who could use one. This might be a bad idea, in that it increases the risk that the attacker will get ahold of the bridge address, since now there are two ways to learn it. But it also might be a good idea, since now it's more likely to get used by somebody who needs it (not everybody knows about the above two URLs after all). I'm not sure what the right balance is. In any case, the Tor network itself hasn't been blocked in Iran, as far as I can tell. So in a sense this bridge stuff (the next step in the arms race) is all just practice. --Roger
