> > We're going to continue to develop Tor in C. Others want Tor in Java, > so we're happy to help them better understand the specifications and > explain decisions we've made along the way. > > So, should the Java port be currently considered an 'unofficial' effort?
- Tor and Java Jacob Appelbaum
- Re: Tor and Java basile
- Re: Tor and Java Andrew Lewman
- Re: Tor and Java Flamsmark
- Re: Tor and Java Andrew Lewman
- Re: Tor and Java Flamsmark
- Re: Tor and Java basile
- Re: Tor and Java Lexi Pimenidis
- Re: Tor and Java Rich Jones
- Re: Tor and Java Lexi Pimenidis
- Re: Tor and Java Rich Jones

