Also, any reason the TOR website does offer something like this? On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:39 PM, M <[email protected]> wrote:
> thanks for the info. I understand that it cant be safer than the real > stuff, but objectively, i do believe its safer than other online proxies, > such as anonymouse? Am i correct? > > > On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 1:39 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 03:52:17AM +0000, [email protected] wrote 0.8K >> bytes in 22 lines about: >> : tor-proxy.net >> : Is it a good alternative if i am out without my TorBrowser Bundle? >> >> To be clear, this service has nothing to do with us as the Tor Project. >> Years ago we asked >> for a disclaimer, http://tor-proxy.net/?q=en/node/1#official. He didn't >> get the Tor url correct. >> >> : Whats the diff between the First option (express)and the third? >> >> You should ask him, http://tor-proxy.net/index.php?q=en/node/7. >> >> I don't think anyone from Tor has actually met the operator, Ben. I >> can't make a value judgement on if this is good or not. I like the fact >> there is no client install, just connect and use Tor. I'm concerned >> that even if Ben is an upstanding privacy activist and truly logs >> nothing, the connection to his dedicated server could still be watched >> and logged by someone else. >> >> Perhaps Ben is on or-talk and can explain his experiences and the setup >> of tor-proxy.net in more detail. >> >> -- >> Andrew Lewman >> The Tor Project >> pgp 0x31B0974B >> >> Website: https://torproject.org/ >> Blog: https://blog.torproject.org/ >> Identi.ca: torproject >> *********************************************************************** >> To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to [email protected] with >> unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/ >> > >
