Scott Bennett schrieb: > > I see I missed the implication in Olaf's main complaint above, which > is that the authorities are advertising more capacity for his node than > his node is advertising.
relax, I'm not complaining. We are all volunteers not being payed for writing tor code. > Checking the current (i.e., valid-after > 2010-04-11 10:00:00) consensus, I see that the authorities have decided > to volunteer 2560 KB/s on behalf of node blutmagie, which is indeed greater > than 2500 KB/s, though only 2.4% greater. yes, I noticed that without mentioning it on this list. It appears to be a common misunderstanding in coding between 2^10 and 10^3. > (For some reason, my current > directory files don't seem to contain a descriptor for blutmagie at all. > I don't know why, but I assume that it will prove to be a temporary > situation.) did my node stop publishing its descriptor again? Traffic has dropped about 80% within the last hours. Have a look at the attached graph. > But the total exit usage question cannot be answered at present because > nothing reports that information at present. maybe I take your advice and add php code at blutmagie tns to sum up the extra-info average rate data and print the so calculated bandwidth instead of max observed one. Regarding superpages: Is it possible to figure out how much cpu time being wasted in address translation with on-board means like vmstat? But I'm certainly not going to migrate my tor node to Windows. Never ever! ;-) regards Olaf
<<inline: anonymizer2.blutmagie.de_2-day.png>>
