On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 03:27:01AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: > >Yup, that's the actual behaviour. Good thing we added the warn, > >otherwise > >it might have gone unnoticed longer. > > > Wow. This is a scandalously bad situation. Is there any chance > that it will get a high priority for being corrected *soon*? Please??
This excludenodes thing has been no end of trouble. The root problem is that it's a feature that absolutely none of the developers use. I wonder if that means there are similar problems with other features that no developers use. In any case, Sebastian started a trac entry for this one: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1929 wherein he starts out by listing a reason that we shouldn't fix it. Please add more pros and cons to the trac entry. (I guess the angry rants can stay here. ;) --Roger *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to [email protected] with unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
