Not sure, but mine goes up and down all the time. I am not on a allocation or accounting like you, but I check several times a day generally, but at least once a day the bandwidth usage is different than before.
It may still be re-balancing, but I also notice that the mode nodes that are running, the lower usage of bandwidth. The less nodes running, my bandwidth has more usage. Just a thought. Jon On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Paul Menzel <paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > Dear Tor folks, > > > I am still seeing the same problem [1]. In April it used the whole limit > of 1 TB and hibernated after the limit was reached, but afterward it > only came back to around 100 GB per month. > > Fast IT is not limiting the bandwidth in any way. I tested that. CPU and > memory are not utilized completely either. > > Here is the output from arm. > > arm - anonymisierungsdienst (Linux...) Tor 0.2.1.26 (recommended) > anonymisierungsdien - 0.0.0.0:9090, Dir Port: 80, Control Port (open): > 9051 > cpu: 0.5% mem: 92 MB (13.0%) pid: 1186 uptime: 14-15:11:11 > fingerprint: B3EC1BF5D7F7D724BA634D91BE5D22D2D7A70160 > flags: Exit, Fast, Guard, Named, Running, Stable, Valid > > I only have > > AccountingMax 500 GB > > set in `/etc/tor/torrc`. > > So it must be a Tor problem. As you can see from the graphs the > bandwidth usage goes up and down quite often. What might be the reason? > Besides it is still below the available 100 Mbit/s. > > So does rebalancing still have problems as indicated in Andrew’s answer > [3]? > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > > [1] http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Mar-2010/msg00010.html > [2] http://www.atagar.com/arm/ > [3] http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Apr-2010/msg00140.html > *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/