On 2011-02-14 John Case wrote: > Where's the answer to this ? I chose edge-case scenarios above, for > sure, but this is the real meat of the implementation of your plans, > and I'd like to know if you've given any thought to this whatsoever. > > What _is_ the "proper" corresponding open port for 25 ? What _do_ you > find an acceptable match for 53 ? What system of weights will you > give ports that don't have an obvious correlary ? > > Oh, by the way - I used TCP port 80 this morning for something other > than cleartext HTTP.
You've already made perfectly clear that you don't get the point. Can we now stop beating the dead horse? Thank you. Regards Ansgar Wiechers -- "All vulnerabilities deserve a public fear period prior to patches becoming available." --Jason Coombs on Bugtraq *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to [email protected] with unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
