-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [email protected] wrote: > What do you guys think about using http://samy.pl/pwnat/ idea to allow > people that want to run a bridge behind a NAT? Maybe enhance the > discovery protocol to this kind of stuff. It's cool to personally implement it if you want to made a NAT-ted node visible: run pwnat on both servers and fire up tor on the internal one. Here in Italy we've a big provider which heavily use NAT (Fastweb) if you dig up the mailing list archive you can find a guy (Ian, maybe? can't recall right now) who was able to publish a NAT-ted node using iptables and an external host.
The only drawback of such solutions is the 1-to-n kill ratio: kill the external node and you kill n clients behind it :( - -- Marco Bonetti Tor research and other stuff: http://sid77.slackware.it/ Slackintosh Linux Project Developer: http://workaround.ch/ Linux-live for powerpc: http://workaround.ch/pub/rsync/mb/linux-live/ My GnuPG key id: 0x0B60BC5F -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuCjVAACgkQTYvJ9gtgvF9oyACdGqohRz5eJ/HCsvKyb7bMC3tu 0xQAoLcW2LH2cs/qmvRpenwxUuQVRz/N =1IjX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- *********************************************************************** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to [email protected] with unsubscribe or-talk in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
