[Richard Ji]
What I mean here is Oracle hasn't done a benchmark since MS and IBM published their numbers.
So do jump to conclusion so fast about who is better.
|| Point taken. They alway leapfrog. On the next jump, Oracle needs to jump about FOUR TIMES
as far. That's alot.
[Richard Ji]
Actually Major Networks makes tons of money from Olympics, the Tour de France. Why do you think they spend so much money to sign the exclusive right to broadcast it?
|| Uh....because the "products" keep getting better? Maybe we should keep looking at benchmark
numbers, too? That's my only argument.
That's fine with me if you found it far more cost-effective to read the results. You said: "Oracle is NEVER in the top three. Usually, it doesn't even show up." Funny just on the tpc site you referred to, Oracle is all I see in the top three for Non-clustered category.
|| See my previous post on the folly of RESTRICTING the servers to NON-clustered systems.
