Our company just recently decided upon Active Directory as the standard for our strategic LDAP architectural needs. This decision was made by our archictectural people after researching Gartner and META group papers, and talking to META group analysts. No software was brought in house and evaluated, nor was a comparative study performed. Unfortunately, this is becoming the trend here, decision-making being done at a higher level w/o input from the people who have to make things work. With the increasing pressure to get solutions out the door ASAP, they think there's little time to research and test alternatives. How reliable and objective is the information provided by organizations such as Gartner and META?? Are they biased towards certain companies or technologies, etc. Comments, opinions? Thanks, Jeff T [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Thomas Jeff INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
