Hi Steve,
I am not much open to freelists. I set them if it is really justified. F.e.
in OPS. I said that because of the transaction freelists. I mean when you
have an application that used to inserting and deleting and updating a lot
with batches and also it is heavy accesed, I think transaction freelists
become a problem. And you could see it with the oradebug dump of processes.
Regards.
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Steve Adams [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: lunes 12 de febrero de 2001 18:31
> Para: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Asunto: RE: Reality check on freelists
>
> Hi Russell,
>
> No, the number of freelist is best made prime, whereas the number of
> transaction
> slots is normally best allowed to default. Also, please note that there is
> a
> block size based limit on the number of freelists you can have, and 100
> would be
> too many for anything other than a 16K block size. Have you seen the
> script
> "suggest_table_freelists.sql" at
> http://www.ixora.com.au/scripts/cache.htm#suggest_table_freelists on the
> Ixora
> web site? If you match the conditions, it may help you to work out the
> real
> degree of block level concurrency. If not, dump a few blocks towards the
> end of
> the segment and then round up the highest interested transaction slot
> count that
> you see to a prime number, and take that as the number of freelists to
> use.
>
> @ Regards,
> @ Steve Adams
> @ http://www.ixora.com.au/
> @ http://www.christianity.net.au/
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Sent: Tuesday, 13 February 2001 2:06
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
> Hi,
> We are working on what will be a one time conversion. One of the tables
> created only for this conversion has around 650 K inserts by around 100
> batch processes. As a reality check, is a freelist of 100 a reasonable
> value, as far as proportion of the block that will be tied up? And as I
> recall from Steve Adams' book, the prime number criteria is for inittrans,
> not freelist?
>
> Cheers,
> Russ Brooks
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> --
> Author: Russell Brooks
> INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
> San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
>
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> --
> Author: Steve Adams
> INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
> San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
> also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Trassens, Christian
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
