Title: RE: Re:RE: RE: Oracle DBA evolution path - please share your opi
I am looking for  a People Soft Oracle application candidate for one of my clients. Please respond with your interest. Thanks Dick Vander Laan from R Vander Search LLC. Great client. Thanks
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: Re:RE: RE: Oracle DBA evolution path - please share your opi

I think I forgot to put a smile in my previous letter.  Sorry, I didn't mean to offend all the respectable software development companies.
 
I didn't speak only about developers .. Developers are responsible for the code, DA is responsible for the ER-model, DBA is responsible for support / maintenance. All of those people are responsible for the end product. 
Take PeopleSoft, Oracle Applications, Platinum, Scala, etc - all of those products are known for their overcomplicated maintenance. Do those companies have time / money to redesign / rewrite their products? Yes. Do they do it? No. It's all about the enormous amount of money they make on customization / support.  The DA's and developers can be well-meaning though and never be aware of the whole plan :-)).
 
Regards,
Michael Netrusov,
www.atelo.com

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 14:01
Subject: RE: Re:RE: RE: Oracle DBA evolution path - please share your opi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Netrusov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Yes, you are absolutely right, nobody is having interest in
> selling quality products.
> Money is coming from the support of the product, not from the
> selling of the product itself. If the product is well-written, then
> it'll be no big deal with maintenance, hence no money from
> contractors who support and "customize" the application (
> read: fix the
> numerous bugs on fly and try to make the whole $hit work ).
> The more complicated the product, the more money is paid for it's
> maintenance. The more money is paid, the more people are is
> interested in working with it.  The only problem is to sell the whole
> stuff - but it's only a matter of the sales department' qualification.


Coming from a development company, I think I have to point out that in my humble opinion the statements above are an unfair generalization. I think developpers in general try to produce a well-written product, and the fact that products get more complicated is that users expect more features from newer versions.

To give an analogy, if I posted on this list "all DBAs try to have a database that requires a lot of manual maintenance and don't document anthing - that's in their interest for job security", I'm sure there would be a general outcry.

------
any ignorant comments made are the sole responsibility of J. R. Kilchoer and should not reflect adversely upon my employer.

 
Jacques R. Kilchoer
(949) 754-8816
Quest Software, Inc.
8001 Irvine Center Drive
Irvine, California 92618
U.S.A.
http://www.quest.com

Reply via email to