Larry,
Sorry I can't help you there. We never put enough load on it to
tell what it would handle.
Other than the Sun->Intel switch, how are things going? Well
I hope.
Me, I'm trying to break into contracting. It appears to be bad timing
for it, but I was helped along a little when my position at Enron was
transferred to Houston, and I chose not to go along with it.
I'll let you know what happens.
Jared
On Friday 13 April 2001 15:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jared,
>
> Even though it was easier to support (which can add up to cost savings) was
> the performance a problem for you where on the Intel boxes?
>
> Regards,
>
> Larry G. Elkins
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jared Still [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 7:14 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: 9iAS -- Boxes on which to run
> >
> >
> >
> > Sorry to hear this Larry.
> >
> > At BlueCross we moved the server off of Intel ( Dual 500 MHZ, NT
> > 4.0 ) because
> > it was *so* much easier to support on Solaris. This sounds like
> > a backwards
> > move that probably cost more in the long run due to maintenance
> > and downtime.
> >
> > Jared
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Jared Still
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
