-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jacques Kilchoer
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 5:26 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Sun Solaris 8 - Listener failed to start a dedicated server pThank you for the suggestions so far.
Rocky Welch suggesting increasing the "processes" parameter in the init.ora
I tried that with one of the 8.1.6 databases.
The "processes" parameter was set to 50, I increased it to 200, shut down that database, restarted the listener (lsnrctl>stop and lsnrctl>start) and restarted the database. I still got "ORA-12500: TNS:listener failed to start a dedicated server process" when trying to connect to that database from the client.John Kangaraj has suggested checking the number of semaphores. I forgot to mention before that I had already looked at that also (I've been bitten by semaphores before.) I counted 780 semaphores being used (from ipcs) and 1024 being the maximum allowed (from /etc/system). (see below)
I'm still new to Sun Solaris and I'm totally stumped. Does anyone else have any other ideas? I really would prefer not running multi-threaded server (MTS) if I don't have to, which was one of the suggestions on Metalink.
Am I interpreting the available memory information correctly? (see below) For physical memory, I think I see 4GB available and 622 MB being used. As far as swap, I see approx. 4GB available.
---------------- semaphores
In /etc/system I see this:
set semsys:seminfo_semmns=1024ipcs shows me this:
$ ipcs -sa
IPC status from <running system> as of Tue May 22 12:46:49 PDT 2001
T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR CGROUP NSEMS OTIME CTIME
Semaphores:
s 5505024 0x6f61806 --ra-r----- oracle dba oracle dba 204 12:46:49 13:02:49
s 262145 0 --ra-r----- oracle dba oracle dba 50 17:52:20 10:46:15
s 1703938 0x2f18d66 --ra-ra---- oracle dba oracle dba 59 12:42:31 14:12:02
s 983043 0xc934c46 --ra-r----- oracle dba oracle dba 54 1:25:44 13:03:40
s 524292 0x81a8556 --ra-r----- oracle dba oracle dba 79 12:46:34 13:06:43
s 2424837 0x40b7ad6 --ra-r----- oracle dba oracle dba 204 1:29:56 13:07:46
s 589830 0 --ra-r----- oracle dba oracle dba 50 12:06:06 19:22:22
s 1048584 0 --ra-r----- oracle dba oracle dba 80 4:03:18 15:55:22
Total: 780
----------------- end of semaphore information
----------------- physical memory
$ /usr/sbin/prtconf | grep -i mem
Memory size: 4096 Megabytes
memory (driver not attached)
virtual-memory (driver not attached)
$ ipcs -pmb
IPC status from <running system> as of Tue May 22 13:15:58 PDT 2001
T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP SEGSZ CPID LPID
Shared Memory:
m 0 0x5000005b --rw-r--r-- root root 4 417 417
m 4201 0x9167ce10 --rw-r----- oracle dba 58998784 26660 7608
m 802 0x63973b5c --rw-r----- oracle dba 5824512 16908 5642
m 1403 0xc7294a0c --rw-rw---- oracle dba 18743296 7115 7584
m 604 0x826b2278 --rw-r----- oracle dba 93601792 27580 7251
m 1005 0x59b783a4 --rw-r----- oracle dba 146014208 1066 7579
m 1807 0xc6e2a74 --rw-r----- oracle dba 4268032 13480 4674
m 2809 0x27a21464 --rw-r----- oracle dba 325394432 26885 17005
----------------- end of physical memory information----------------- swap space
$ /usr/sbin/swap -s
total: 910872k bytes allocated + 2232248k reserved = 3143120k used, 4208264k available
----------------- end of swap space information
Title: RE: Sun Solaris 8 - Listener failed to start a dedicated server p
Jacques,
I've seen a similar
error with processes and Solaris memory structures. Someone mentioned
increasing SEMMNS, this helped in my situation, however you can try decreasing
the PROCESSES parameter temporarily (as low as possible) to test whether the
Solaris memory setup is an issue. There is a formula for sizing SEMMNS,
cannot currently find it.
Good
luck!
- RE: Sun Solaris 8 - Listener failed to start a dedicated ... John Kanagaraj
- RE: Sun Solaris 8 - Listener failed to start a dedic... Jacques Kilchoer
- RE: Sun Solaris 8 - Listener failed to start a dedic... eric harrington
- RE: Sun Solaris 8 - Listener failed to start a dedic... Narender Akula
- RE: Sun Solaris 8 - Listener failed to start a dedic... Hagedorn, Linda
- RE: Sun Solaris 8 - Listener failed to start a dedic... John Kanagaraj
- RE: Sun Solaris 8 - Listener failed to start a dedic... Shahid Nasir
- RE: Sun Solaris 8 - Listener failed to start a dedic... Jyoti N
- RE: Sun Solaris 8 - Listener failed to start a dedic... Jacques Kilchoer
- RE: Sun Solaris 8 - Listener failed to start a dedic... Jacques Kilchoer
- RE: Sun Solaris 8 - Listener failed to start a dedic... Nihar
- RE: Sun Solaris 8 - Listener failed to start a dedic... John Kanagaraj
