Jared Still wrote:
>
> Same old FUD. Try to associate your competition with
> a scary word and make them a pariah.
>
> McCarthyism in the 50's, Balmerism in the 00's.
>
> Jared
>
> On Friday 01 June 2001 14:17, Jamadagni, Rajendra wrote:
> > Read the story here
> > (<url>http://www.suntimes.com/output/tech/cst-fin-micro01.html</url>) and
> > have a good laugh.
> >
> > LOL! TGIF
> > Raj
This is not an email that I would normally post to the list - but since
its the weekend - why not?
Jared,
The GPL has been referred to as a "virus" previously, due to inclusion
of GPL code causing the entire piece of code (at the execution unit) to
be required to be released under the same license.
I have a problem with this section of the article:
<snip>
Q: Do you view Linux and the open-source movement as a threat to
Microsoft?
A: Yeah. It's good competition. It will force us to be innovative. It
will force us to
justify the prices and value that we deliver. And that's only healthy.
The only thing
we have a problem with is when the government funds open-source work.
Government funding should be for work that is available to everybody.
Open source
is not available to commercial companies. The way the license is
written, if you use
any open-source software, you have to make the rest of your software
open source.
If the government wants to put something in the public domain, it
should. Linux is not
in the public domain. Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an
intellectual property
sense to everything it touches. That's the way that the license works.
<snip>
"Open Source" != "GPL".
The GPL is one license - there are many like it, many unlike it.
http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses
Here is an article by Stallman
http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9911/08/freedom.GNU.idg/
Linus Torvalds chose the GPL so that no one could "own" Linux.
There are other licenses that can be used for Free Software or Open
Source Software, such as the LGPL, Apache and BSD Artistic License. I've
heard rumors that much of the TCP/IP stack in Windows 2000 has its
origins in FreeBSD code - licensed under the BSD license.
To Balmer - if Microsoft cannot "own" it - it is evil - and should not
be funded.
As not all Open Source work is licensed under the GPL, his statement is
overly broad and therefore false.
Paul
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Paul Drake
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
