Paul,

They are RAID 4. And WAFL is their own proprietary system and you have very 
little control over allocation. You don't need to worry about it. (or so the 
sales rep and engineer said)

Rachel


>From: Paul Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Forever running Analyze
>Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:10:53 -0800
>
>Kevin,
>
>I thought that those are actually RAID 4.
>You don't have any control over allocation on a NetApp box?
>Is that due to inherent limitations of the volume manager/file systems
>or due to implementation specific to your SysAdmins' biases?
>
>thanks,
>
>Paul
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 6:39 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
>New file system is out.   We are running on Net App Appliances containing a
>Raid 5 system on Solaris using Oracle 8.0.5.   Not the best environment but
>its what we have to work with.  So, hardware is out.
>
>As far as file system tuning .....  Another no.  Its a Waffle system .....
>basicly, write anywhere , so where you put the tables and indexes are prety
>much a moot point.
>
>So, we are down to runnig it at night.  Not the kind of suggestion I was
>looking for .... but its the one I figured I would hear.
>
>Oh well.
>
>Thanks anyway.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 5:05 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
>buy a better i/o subsystem?  this should finish in single digit minutes, at
>worst.
>
>ok, can't do that?
>
>then
>
>tune the i/o system
>can't?
>ok, then partition the table/index to faster/more/different drives
>can't?
>ok, then run the analyze at night via cron
>can't
>ok, then screw it, it's not worth it.  ( just kidding )
>
>-----Original Message-----
>Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 5:31 PM
>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
>Hi folks;
>  We have an Analyze running that is taking forever.  Here is the setup:
>    The table is about 250 bytes wide.
>    The table is normally 100,000 rows
>    The table has grown to over 4,000,000 rows.
>    There is one index on 1 column.
>    We used the Compute Statistics options
>
>Does anyone have any suggestions on how we can get this analyze to complete
>and still generate worthwile statistics ??
>
>Thanks
>
>Kevin
>
>--
>Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
>--
>Author: Paul Drake
>   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
>San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
>to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
>the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
>(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
>also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Rachel Carmichael
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to