http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/19805.html
<http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/19805.html> 

                         Compaq Alpha box steals 9i benchmark laurels
                    By Andrew Orlowski in San Francisco
                    Posted: 19/06/2001 at 11:49 GMT

                    Compaq is first out of the blocks with a barnstorming
midrange benchmark for
                    a system running Oracle 9i. 

                    If you've got $13 million to spare - which is a lot for
a midrange system, quite
                    frankly - you can get a 32-way AlphaServer GS320 to run
230,533
                    Benchmark C transactions per minute using Oracle 9i.
That works out as
                    $56.62 per transaction. The system clocked 188,000
users, and ran
                    Compaq's Tru64 Unix. (Which was Digital Unix, and OSF/1
before that). 

                    Compaq's configuration also includes 16 PIIIs. The $13
million figure is for the
                    cost of the system over three years. The AlphaServer
itself is billed at under
                    half a million dollars, that's a quarter of the cost of
licensing Oracle 9i
                    software. As usual in these systems, storage accounts
for most of the rest. 

                    By comparison, the Unix systems to beat in the TPC-C Top
Ten include a
                    32way Solaris SPARC Fujitsu system, the PrimePower 2000,
which clocks
                    222,772 TPC-C at $51.40, making it the highest
non-clustered performer; an
                    IBM RS/6000 S85 'pServer' clocking 220,807 at $43.30,
and an HP 9000
                    Superdome clocking 197,024 at $53.77 per transaction. 

                    The full, 234 page PDF for the AlphaServer can be found
here. 

                    Not everyone likes to measure their hardware against the
synthetic TPC-C
                    benchmarks. TPC-C scores have been criticised for mixing
clustered and
                    non-clustered results in the same league table, and more
importantly, failing to
                    replicate real word application conditions. 

                    But it's an itch no vendor seems to be able to resist
scratching. �
 
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)

Systems Admin & Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des syst�mes
Technology Services        | Services technologiques
Informatics Branch         | Direction de l'informatique 
Maritimes Region, DFO      | R�gion des Maritimes, MPO

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Boivin, Patrice J
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to