Note:118005.1 says, at one point, that the DLM_LOCKS_CFG
parameter is "the maximum amount of DLM locks available"
this is somewhat misleading and therefore somewhat dangerous.
Our SAs set it to the "maximum" and (yes, foolishly, i think)
wound up setting it to about 1GB, and getting a kernel
problem.
More likely, the Note should say:
"Set DLM_LOCKS_CFG to twice the number of peak locks anticipated"
or somesuch.
Anyone from Oracle care to comment on how best to put in a
document change request to spare someone else this potential pain?
- Ross
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 10:32 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Anyone out there using OPS ver7 on Tru64 Alpha?
I'd be interested in swapping DLM parameters.
We just applied an OWS-suggested fix and it apparently
ran the box into the ground.
Any thoughts welcome.
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Mohan, Ross
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
