Ooohhhhh...wow!  Quick, maybe we should run out and convince 90% of the
business world that their entire infrastructure is a complete and udder pipe
dream and that the idea of trying to simplify our lives with the GUI is also
just a big fat waste of time.  Then everyone can get rid of their computers
that have windows and Unix can take over the world.  Yeah...archaic coding
at a monochrome terminal..jeez the future looks so bright!!!!
KK
:)
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 5:12 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


No doubt that came from your redhat Linux box cause you wanted to dabble
in playing with a real os (and I'm certainly not saying that rh isn't
crap), till you found out that it was too "hard" cause you couldn't use
your mouse on a console (ok, gdm, but nm that). Yet you probably tell
others that you've used both extensively and find NT to be the "better" :)
Why? cause you got a 2.2 kernel to install on a referb dell box? When you
priorities become io throughput, domain utilization, rebuilding your rt
scheduler to handle the demand of certain applications, fail-over on 10
million dollar machines, and multipathing to arrays that have more
computing power than your whole fleet of NT boxes, instead of getting a
smile cause you "figured" out how to point and click your way to happiness
w/ windows Active directory or IIS, then you can mock me :)

Thanks,
jon


"The idea that Bill Gates has appeared like a knight in shining armor to
lead all customers out of a mire of technological chaos neatly ignores the
fact that it was he who, by peddling second- rate technology, led them into
it in the first place."

-- Douglas Adams

"If you have trouble sounding condescending, find a Unix user to show you
how it's done."

-- Scott Adams

On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Mohan, Ross wrote:

> :)
> You caught me, Jon. Your numeric perspicacity and
> penetrating, thoughtful analysis of the NT development
> effort has really got me re-evaluating my operating
> system worldview.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 3:56 PM
> To: Mohan, Ross
> Cc: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: OT RE: 24 x 7 on NT?
>
>
> why doesnt anyone just compare the platforms that the respective nt/unix
> versions run on? I dont really care for intel from square one, much less a
> proprietary bloated, over marketed, under reliable software to run on top
> of it :) I think it just boils down to... you cant admin a unix system
> properly if you dont care, and if you care, you dont want to admin NT, so
> all that NT has behind it is a bunch of non-caring hs dropouts who got
> their mcse and are working on a cisco certification. Not saying that linux
> hasnt brought a slew of script kiddies into the unix melting pot... but
> atleast they atempt to care and are easy to manage "time to apply some
> patches before some script kiddies nail my ass" :) Are you sure that there
> arent a few extra digits in that uptime there bud? ;) We could invent more
> reasonable values that pre-epoch (hell, even pre-digital computer) in the
> future.
>
> Thanks,
> jon
>
>
> "The idea that Bill Gates has appeared like a knight in shining armor to
> lead all customers out of a mire of technological chaos neatly ignores the
> fact that it was he who, by peddling second- rate technology, led them
into
> it in the first place."
>
> -- Douglas Adams
>
> "If you have trouble sounding condescending, find a Unix user to show you
> how it's done."
>
> -- Scott Adams
>
> On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Mohan, Ross wrote:
>
> > Here's my Unix box:
> >
> > # uptime
> >  12:09 pm  up 32,245 days,  1:01,  14543 users,  load average: 120.19,
> > 430.48, 3450.70
> >
> > Here's my NT box:
> >
> > # uptime
> >  12:09 pm  up 1 days,  1:01,  1 users,  load average: 0.019, 0.008,
> 0.00070
> >
> >
> > So, obviously, NT sucks. <dusting off hands>.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 1:16 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> >
> >
> > Well, my UNIX box would probably run forever except that the DDS3 tape
> > changer can't seem to last a whole year without breaking. Need to shut
the
> > machine down to replace the tape changer. I'm hoping to get lucky this
> year.
> > Only 120 days till victory!
> >
> > # uptime
> >  12:09 pm  up 245 days,  1:01,  4 users,  load average: 0.19, 0.48, 0.70
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 9:26 AM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001,Mohan, Ross scribbled on the wall in glitter crayon:
> >
> > ->I agree with His Chrisness on this one.
> > ->
> > ->If the avg(NT Admin) > avg(Unix Admin), we'd
> > ->all be reading this mail on Window's boxes.
> > ->Er.....what I mean to say is......
> > ->
> > -><sly grin>
> > ->
> > ->but, in all seriousness....when there is a way
> > ->to find a *very good* NT admin out of all the
> > ->Wendy's employees, then NT boxes will be up
> > ->4 or 5 nines, easy.
> > ->
> > ->Besides guys, "five nines" means you're down
> > ->about FIVE MINUTES a year.
> > ->
> > ->Now, how many of the Unix boxes on this list
> > ->have done that this year?  I bet less than
> > ->one percent.
> >
> > well, then there must be a whole lot of unix boxes out there because
we've
> > got 40 of them right here.  i'd say all of my 32 databases have been up
> that
> > much too, but i've only had 25 of them up a whole year.;-)  yup, i know
> i've
> > been lucky.
> >
> > --
> > Bill "Shrek" Thater   Certifiable ORACLE DBA
> > Telergy, Inc.            [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > You gotta program like you don't need the money,
> > You gotta compile like you'll never get hurt,
> > You gotta run like there's nobody watching,
> > It's gotta come from the heart if you want it to work.
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Expert systems are built to embody the knowledge of human experts.  -
> > Kulawiec
> >
> > --
> > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> > --
> > Author: Thater, William
> >   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
> > San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> > to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> > the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> > (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
> > also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
> >
> >
> > * * * * * Freedom of Information Act Notice * * * * *
> > The information in this email is subject to the record protection
mandated
> > by 5 United States Code 552(b)(4) and relevant judicial opinions.
> > --
> > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> > --
> > Author: Sherman, Edward
> >   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
> > San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> > to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> > the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> > (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
> > also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
> > --
> > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> > --
> > Author: Mohan, Ross
> >   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
> > San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> > to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> > the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> > (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
> > also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
> >
>

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Jon Allen
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Kevin Kostyszyn
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to