Me neither. I've had database 50-70G in size on NT. (Which, in the grand
scale of things isn't terribly large, but it's my personal experience
and sufficient for this example). Compaq ProLiant servers, Compaq RAID
controllers and storage arrays. Very nice equipment, rock solid and very
fast. So long as you stick to the OEM'd drivers, you won't go wrong. I
am a huge fan of Compaq servers, they must have learnt a great deal
about system engineering from their acquisition of DEC.
Nothing personal to anyone reading this, but there are a whole bunch of
people on this list who have very strong anti-NT sentiments, which
aren't always justified, IMHO. YMMV. <rant>Don't even get me started on
Unix, which sucks. Rebooting if you need more file descriptors?! Or
shared memory? All operating systems suck. Apart from maybe VMS.</rant>
g
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 12:02 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi,
Regarding the issue of databases larger than 1GB on NT, could someone
please
explain this to me, as I was not aware of this 'saying'.
Thanks in advance,
Steven H.
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Guy Hammond
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
