LIVE THE *REAL* AMERICAN DREAM




Some of Planner/Visionary/Activist Duany's work contains scathing 
criticism of the failed nature of political correctness (fashionable 
nonsense) in academia, particularly the knee jerk manner in which 
*the good and the beautiful*, as was designed into traditional urban 
development patterns, is rejected in service of vacuous "liberal"/ 
deconstructionist ideological conformism:

http://www.dpz.com/Writings-FilesInserted/B-02-N02-Robert%20Stern.htm
-
http://www.dpz.com/Writings-FilesInserted/B-02-N03-replyto.htm

------------------------------

http://www.dpz.com/
-
http://www.harmonysc.com/
-
http://www.hpix.com/nmg/
-



Article on neighborhood "values" vs suburban sprawl. 

(includes some very interesting analysis of the manner in which 
planning reforms would greatly reduce socioeconomic "discrimination" 
by making it easier for poor people to live near work, shopping and 
mix with more affluent people):

http://www.dpz.com/Writings-FilesInserted/B-02-P13-sprawl.htm

--- text ---
1. Writing by Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk


The Traditional Neighborhood and Suburban Sprawl:

Attributes and Consequences

The congested, fragmented, unsatisfying suburban sprawl and the 
disintegrating urban centers of today are not merely
products of laissez-faire nor the inevitable results of mindless 
greed. They are thoroughly planned to be as they are: the
direct result of zoning and subdivision ordinances zealously 
administered by planning departments. 

If the results are dismaying, it is because the model of the city 
being projected is dismal. These ordinances dictate three
criteria for urbanism: the free and rapid flow of traffic, parking in 
quantity, and the rigorous separation of building use. The
result of these criteria is that automobile traffic and its landscape 
have become the central, unavoidable experience of the
public realm. 

The traditional pattern of walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods has been 
inadvertently prohibited by current ordinances. Thus,
designers find themselves in the ironic situation of being forbidden 
from building in the manner of our admired historic
places. One cannot propose a new Annapolis, Marblehead, or Key West, 
without seeking substantial variances from current
codes. 

Thus, there are two types of urbanism available. The neighborhood, 
which was the model in North America from the first
settlements to the second World War, and Suburban Sprawl, which has 
been the model since then. They are similar in their
initial capacity to accommodate people and their activities; the 
principal difference is that Suburban Sprawl contains
environmental, social, and economic deficiencies that inevitably 
choke sustained growth. 

 

The neighborhood has the following physical attributes: 

 The Neighborhood is a comprehensive planning increment: when 
clustered with others, it becomes a town; when standing
free in the landscape, it becomes a village. The Neighborhood varies 
in population and density to accommodate localized
conditions. 

 The Neighborhood is limited in size so that a majority of the 
population is within a 5-minute walking distance of its center
(1/4 mile). The needs of daily life are theoretically available 
within this area. This center provides an excellent location for
a transit stop, convenience work places, retail, community events, 
and leisure activities. 

 The streets are laid out in a network, so that there are alternate 
routes to most destinations. This permits most streets to be
smaller with slower traffic as well as having parking, trees, 
sidewalks, and buildings. They are equitable for both vehicles
and pedestrians. 

 The streets are spatially defined by a wall of buildings that front 
the sidewalk in a disciplined manner, uninterrupted by
parking lots. 

 The buildings are diverse in function, but compatible in size and in 
disposition on their lots. There is a mixture of houses
(large and small), outbuildings, small apartment buildings, shops, 
restaurants, offices, and warehouses. 

 Civic buildings (schools, meeting halls, theaters, churches, clubs, 
museums, etc.) are often placed on squares or at the
termination of street vistas. By being built at important locations, 
these buildings serve as landmarks. 

 Open space is provided in the form of specialized squares, 
playgrounds, and parks and, in the case of villages, greenbelts. 

 

Suburban sprawl has quite different physical attributes: 

 Sprawl is disciplined only by isolated "pods", which are dedicated 
to single uses such as "shopping centers", "office
parks", and "residential clusters". All of these are inaccessible 
from each other except by car. Housing is strictly segregated
in large clusters containing units of similar cost, hindering 
socioeconomic diversity. 

 Sprawl is limited only by the range of the automobile which easily 
forms cachment areas for retail, often exceeding 50
miles. 

 There is a high proportion of cul-de-sacs and looping streets within 
each pod. Through traffic is possible only by means of
a few "collector" streets which, consequently, become easily 
congested. 

 Vehicular traffic controls the scale and form of space, with streets 
being wide and dedicated primarily to the automobile.
Parking lots typically dominate the public space. 

 Buildings are often highly articulated, rotated on their lots, and 
greatly set back from streets. They are unable to create
spatial definition or sense of place. Civic buildings do not normally 
receive distinguished sites. 

 Open space is often provided in the form of "buffers", "pedestrian 
ways", "berms", and other ill-defined residual spaces. 

 

The neighborhood has several positive consequences: 

 By bringing most of the activities of daily living into walking 
distance, everyone (especially the elderly and the young)
gains independence of movement. 

 By reducing the number and length of automobile trips, traffic 
congestion is minimized, the expenses of road construction
are limited, and air pollution is reduced. 

 By providing streets and squares of comfortable scale with defined 
spatial quality, neighbors, walking, can come to know
each other and to watch over their collective security. 

 By providing appropriate building concentrations at easy walking 
distances from transit stops, public transit becomes a
viable alternative to the automobile. 

 By providing a full range of housing types and work places, age and 
economic classes are integrated and the bonds of an
authentic community are formed. 

 By providing suitable civic buildings and spaces, democratic 
initiatives are encouraged and the balanced evolution of
society is facilitated. 

 By assuming that the people will drive to and from all activities, 
the need for large streets and parking lots becomes a
self-fulfilling prophecy. The exhaust emissions resulting from such 
trips are the single greatest source of air pollution in the
United States. 

 

Suburban sprawl has several negative consequences: 

 By the construction of an excessive asphalt infrastructure, the 
natural landscape is destroyed. Each automobile not only
generates roadways, but also requires a paved parking place at the 
dwelling, another at the work place, and yet another at the
shopping center. 

 By consigning the bulk of the available public budget to pay for 
asphalt infrastructure, the human infrastructure of good
schools, post offices, fire stations, meeting halls, cultural 
buildings, and affordable housing is starved. 

 

Certain classes of citizens who suffer particularly from the pattern 
of suburban sprawl include: 

 The middle class, who are forced into multiple automobile ownership. 
The average yearly cost of car ownership is $5,000,
which is the equivalent of a $50,000 mortgage payment. The 
possibility of owning one less car is the single most important
subsidy that can be provided towards affordable housing. By 
forbidding mixed use areas, the investment of personal time in
the activity of commuting is mandatory. A person who drives 2 hours a 
day spends the equivalent of 8 working weeks a year
in the car. 

 The young, below the legal driving age, who are dependent on adults 
for their social needs. They are bused to schools,
from which they cannot walk, and isolated at home until their working 
parents arrive. The alternative is to relegate one
parent to a career as the child's chauffeur. The single family house 
with the yard is a good place for childhood only if it is
structured as part of a Neighborhood. Within these, the child can 
walk or bicycle to school, to play, to the store, to the
movies, and to friends' houses. 

 The elderly, who lose their self-sufficiency once they lose their 
drivers' licenses. Healthy seniors citizens who may
continue to live independently within a Neighborhood are otherwise 
consigned to specialized retirement communities where
their daily needs are met at great cost. 

 

Suburban sprawl usually accommodates the correct balance of work 
places, living places, schools, and open space in
what appears to be proximity. However, proximity is not enough; the 
detailing of the public space to accommodate the
pedestrian is also necessary: 

 Buildings must be aligned along streets and squares. The current 
fashion of staggering or rotating buildings hinders the
creation of public space defined by the buildings. 

 Trees along streets must also be aligned in a disciplined manner. 
This is particularly important to remedy spaces when
over-large setbacks cannot be avoided. Picturesque planting patterns 
should be reserved for parks and squares, not for
streets and avenues. 

 Parallel parking must be provided on most streets. A layer of parked 
cars protects the pedestrians from traffic
psychologically. Parking lots, when they are needed, should be placed 
to the rear of buildings to avoid the gaps that make
sidewalks uninteresting to use. House lots, if less than fifty feet 
wide, should be provided with alleys so that garage doors do
not overwhelm the street facades. 

 At intersections, the radius at the curb should not exceed 15 feet. 
This maintains a viable pedestrian crossing distance and
reduces the speed of automobiles making the turn. 

 High capacity streets within urbanized areas should have the 
geometry of avenues, not of highways. Highways are
unpleasant for pedestrians and deteriorate adjacent building value, 
while avenues are compatible with buildings and people.
Highways should be reserved for the countryside and be built without 
strip development. 

 

In a neighborhood, affordable housing occurs naturally and in a 
highly integrated manner. This is achieved by the
following means: 

 The affordable housing looks like the market-rate housing, using 
similar exterior materials, windows, and building forms.
Affordable housing is not segregated and is never clustered in large 
numbers. A good ratio is one affordable unit to ten
market-rate units. 

 Housing is provided above retail establishments. This type of 
dwelling can be provided for the cost of construction alone,
because the cost of land can be assigned to the retail component of 
the building. 

 Garage apartments or cottages are available in the backyards of 
single family houses. These rental units, of limited size,
provide extremely affordable housing that is interspersed with market-
rate housing. This also allows teenagers to stay at
home and the elderly to live with their families. 

Current codes monitor only traffic flow, parking counts, the 
segregation of building use, and the safeguard of wetlands. New
codes must be written that include effective provisions for the 
neighborhood, which is human habitat in all its complexity.


--- end ---


??????????????????????????????????

"anuses of the Revolution":

http://babelfish.altavista.com 

( paste in:
http://www.dpz.com/Writings-FilesInserted/B-02-P08-lahabana.htm )

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Eric D. Pierce
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to