Apart from the comments other posters
have made about truncate and the HWM,
bear in mind that a scan after deleting 100,000
rows would probably be doing a lot of
delayed block cleanout - resulting in plenty
of redo log, and possibly a lot of dbwr activity.
Jonathan Lewis
Seminars on getting the best out of Oracle
Last few places available for Sept 10th/11th
See http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
-----Original Message-----
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 16 August 2001 21:46
|I have a user that deleted all of the rows in a table
|(i.e. 100,000), waited for it to complete, and then
|ran a SELECT COUNT(1) FROM <table>. It took a few
|minutes for '0 rows' to be returned to the prompt. The
|table has ~60 extents (128k ea.). Granted, the number
|of extents is excessive but it's a development
|instance and this table is an exception.
|
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Jonathan Lewis
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
