------- Forwarded message follows -------

...

> > America, and its libertarian and democratic traditions, are weakened 
> > by godlessness, hypocrisy, racism and bigotry.  
> > 
> 
> Eric,
> 
> I am with you 99.9 percent. The one word I have to disagree with is
> "godlessness". There are many people in the world who lead good, honest, and
> selfless lives whose belief system does not include a God in the
> muslim/jewish/christian sense of a divine being, but whose world view,
> ethics, and morality still lead them to condemn evil and support good. Those
> people include many Buddhists (Buddhism includes theistic, pantheistic,
> polytheistic and atheistic views), humanists, and others. 

My brother is a Buddhist (and arguably a redneck truck driver, but a 
damn authentic one!), and I grew up for 4 years in Japan.

As you inply, not all Buddhists would are dogmatic about needing to 
be atheists.

I have seen extremely involved discussion between God-believers in 
the western spiritual tradition, and people that label themselves as 
"atheist buddhists", and from what I gather, the atheist budhists do 
a have a fairly strong theological/scriptural case.

What the Buddha himself would have thought of such "angels on the 
head of a pin" discussion is probably more interesting. :)

In my opinion, the vast majority of the humanist and other moral 
systems that exist specifically as "non-religious" philosophies is 
that it is impossible to seperate the origins of those philosophies 
from the historical existence and reality of the spiritual traditions 
of the world.

In other words, since they are derivative, they can't invalidate 
Revelation.

Of course one could argue the opposite, and maybe both are true. :)

> 
> I hate to be seeming pedantic at a time like this, but I think of we are to
> embrace tolerance and reject intolerance, then the acceptance of people who
> worship God in ways other than our own also has to include people who choose
> not to worship God at all. Or as somebody once said of the US Constitution,
> "the guarantee of freedom of religion includes a guarantee of freedom from
> religion". 

That is not the problem at this point in history as far as I know.

The problem is that there is a very powerful effort by 
marxists/leftists, and large numbers of people duped, or at least 
influenced by, radical/leftist thought, that are making decisions 
about the nature of the very "structures of knowedge" in academia, 
the public education system, the "media" and government. If you 
research "political correctness", you will find that the left is in 
the process of seriously undermining the entire foundation of 
democracy, which is based on the western spiritual tradition (see Joh 
Taylor Gatto - http://csf.colorado.edu/sine/transcripts/gatto.html ,
linked from http://www.preservenet.com ). 

What you will find is that the atheist-left is just as doctinaire and 
hegemonic in forcing their ideology as anyone else. And their 
ideology, unlike the western spiritual tradition's emphasis on deep 
contemplative self-examination, has virtually no internal mechanisms 
to prevent such excesses.

Note that the above speech by Gatto was at the zen Naropa Institute 
in Boulder, Colorado, which was co-founded by the great Buddhist 
thinker and universalist Ken Wilber. I would urge you to take a 
serious look at Wilber's writings on the nature of human 
conciousness, and where we are at right now in history. At least do 
some web searches, there are some great interviews of Wilber on 
Shambala Publisher's web site.

As a mystic (and universalist) since early childhood, I'm not 
impressed at all by the Ayn Rand school of libertarian thought, so 
sorry if that is what you are getting at. The idea that all of 
humanity ought to be pushed to the edge of staring over the brink of 
oblivion and into the great void of the universe on a daily basis 
seems bizarre if not psychotic. I just don't see why, given a serious 
rational investigation, the anti-religious limits in thought that the 
Randists advocate make any sense at all.

(eg, here is an alternative approach: http://www.ssq.net )

regards,
ep

------- End of forwarded message -------
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Eric D. Pierce
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to