hi cyril,
open_cursors determines the maximum # of open cursors
u can have in ur shared sql area / libray cache of the
shared pool. assumimg that u previously had this set
to 500. Now when u set it to 1000, obviously oracle
needs more memory to handle additional open cursors..
the risks of ur application failing with an out of
open_cursors errors far outweigh the memory
requirements to maintain these .. and these days when
memory is cheap .. it should not impact memory .. i
mean its not that this will suck off all available
memory
deepak
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was just wondering what was the performance and
> impact of having
> open_cursors set to 1000. Will it require more
> shared_memory, etc...
>
> Thanks
>
> Cyril Jaouich (Consultant Unix)
> -------------------------------
> Centre de support informatique CSI
> ----------------------------------
> T�l 514-289-2211 x6237 (jusqu'au 7 sept)
> T�l 514-840-3000 x5527 (� partir du 10 sept)
>
__________________________________________________
Terrorist Attacks on U.S. - How can you help?
Donate cash, emergency relief information
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/fc/US/Emergency_Information/
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Deepak Thapliyal
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
