Hi Ivo, we are on Linux RH, 8.1.7.0.1. I've tried cursor_sharing=force. Unfortunately, it causes ORA-600. Do 8.1.7.1(2) patches fix this problem?
Regards, Ed > Hi Ed > have you tried cursor_sharing=force ? I dont know what version of oracle you > have and there are some known problems but maybe it can help you with > literal sql statements and then decreasing size of shared_pool. > Ivo > > > -----Original Message----- > Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 12:11 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > > > Hi Steve, > > yes, you're absolutely right. I've inhereted that system. The > shared_pool_size = 750M. I believe it's HUGE and oversized. The application > code is mostly based on literal SQL. The miss rate on the shared pool is > normally about 15%-20% with periodical peaks up to 50%. But the previous DBA > insist that we shouldn't decrease the size of shared pool as the miss rate > will be much higher. He also setup periodical flushing every 3 hours (I > assume he did it in order to prevent ORA-4031). > If I undestand the things right, deacresing of shared_pool_size will > decrease load on shared pool latch _but_ contention on the library latches > will be higher because of higher parse rate. Is it correct and what's your > advice in my case? > > Thanks in advance, > Ed -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Edward Shevtsov INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
