shuli wrote:
> 
> Dear listers,
>      Could someone share his/her experience on partitioned IOT. I am quite
> confused now. I have an partitioned IOT. The performance of query data from one
> partiton of the partitioned IOT is worse than query data from the unpartitioned
> IOT.
>      Any advice would be greatly appreciared.
>      Shu
> 

Shu,

   IOTs are not, whether they are partitioned or not, any more than
anything else, the answer. They are an answer to some special queries
which are highly important to your application (and, possibly, reasons
linked to ease of operation). If non-partitioned performs better, go for
non-partitioned. The only problem I am aware of with partitioned IOTs is
that you may have deadlocks with SELECTs if you are concurrently
partitioning them (true in both 8.1.6 and 8.1.7).
-- 
Regards,

Stephane Faroult
Oriole Ltd
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Stephane Faroult
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to