There have been turf wars between "central" 
(mainframe/unix oriented) and "departmental" (NT 
oriented) SysAdmns here for 5+ years (administration 
promulgated a "decentralization" policy, and changed 
IT funding to support it). 

Now, some of the "departmental" SysAdmns are finally 
getting sick of some of the overhead involved in 
running the own little fiefdoms.

At the same time, "central" LAN gurus are taking on AD 
implementation.

With reference to the above, yesterday I heard a 
"central" SysAdmn/LAN guru saying:

"MS Exchange runs on SQL Server"

what does that mean?

Is the SQL Server that Exchange runs on pretty much 
the same as the off-the-shelf version that one would 
install for standard development purposes, or is it 
"pre-tuned", specially configured, etc?

thanks,
ep


ORACLE-L Digest -- Volume 2002, Number 025
> ------------------------------
> 
>  From: bill thater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 14:14:51 -0500
>  Subject: Re: Backup Strategy
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> >JoJo --
> >
> >Sure, but be aware that Unix abaci are better than NT abaci.
> >
> don't forget the VMS abaci.;-)
> 
> 


-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Eric D. Pierce
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to