Title: RE: SMON - Does it cause a degrade?

Check out meta link note:61997.1  SMON - Temporary Segment Cleanup and Free Space Coalescing.  For one explanation.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 4:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: SMON - Does it cause a degrade?


Hey Fellas,

I have an application DBA who insists that the pctincrease at the data
tablespace should be set to 0 so that SMON does not coalesce the
tablespace. He says coalesce will be performed by using a scheduled batch
job written for that purpose. He states that having SMON to perform an
coalesce of the tablespace could cause an performance degrade??? I have
never heard of such a thing, but then I dont wanna argue with him. He's got
wrinkles on his face, and grey hair ;-)

My argument would be, go back to the drawing board, get your tables sized
properly, if you anticipate fragmentation. And SMON does not cause a
performance degrade? It wakes up every 5 minutes, does hold ST enqueue
locks if a tablespace needs coalescing, but it does not cause a performance
degrade? Or does it???

Now, can I have a definitive word on this? Any sites, white papers, to
refer to that says so, or to the contrary. I need to convince the higher
ups.

Raj

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to